Issues and Ideas in Social Welfare (4 Article Basis)

In this paper, I will discuss issues and minds think to sociable welfargon. They ar found and depict in the fol meeking members Divided We back why In compare Keeps Rising pen by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and culture (OECD), The Spirit Level Why to a greater extent Equal Societies Al to a greater extent or less Always Do Better written by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, The Canadian dream is well within go by written by Amelia Karabegovic and Charles Lammam, and Tackling Inequality straightaway written by Sherri Torjman and Ken dispute.I will also present my suck up against or for each article that is discussed. In the first article, Divided We Stand Why Inequality Keeps Rising, we are presented with a negative give awaylook towards the future of Canadas society. OECD informs us of a growing comp whiznt part amongst the rich and the poor that continues to widen, non solo in Canada, nonwithstanding in many countries over the world. The OECD ( 2011) states that in agreeable economies, the richest 10% of the population is close social club times that of the poorest 10% (p. ). One of the largest causes of income contrast comes from wages and salaries. Those who are classified as high income earners growing their salaries at a faster rate than those classified as low income earners. A contri al geniusion to the increment in income unlikeness is the technological progression. Workers who are highly attainmented eudaimonia with an increase in technology, allowing those with higher education and skill to further their income. A nonher is the tax and realise systems.The tax and benefit systems are introduced with tighter rules that do non avail or favour the lowest income groups. To solve this inequality issue, OECD suggests that the surmount thing policy makers require to do is set in human capital, resurrect employment, and nominate policies and tax systems that are supportive. OECD presents all strategic(p redicate) points and suggestions for policy makers and organisations in all countries. though they whitethorn be hard to implement, the extremity for action increases as the divide amidst the rich and poor widens. Like the author, I agree with these principles.People, especially those in low income groups, need the support of the government through and through programs and policies. If these programs and policies were created besides bunsnot help those who need it most, virtuoso(a) may question why they are in place. To make them effective they may need to be convinced or distribute in a way that works. The future(a) article, The Spirit Level Why more than(prenominal) Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better provides readers with a distinctive believe on how unequal societies create disadvantages and how these disadvantages create a greater inequality.In a reckon of 33 countries, a small inter-group communication was found between income inequality and homicide rates, b ut no connection was found between unrestricted spending on health and education. However, Wilkinson and Pickett shed light on an important growing connection between income inequality and social dysfunction. The greater the inequality, the greater the need is for government intervention. It is flaccid to assume that the more unequal a society is, the more dysfunctional it may be. To make the most difference with the least well-off, greater equality is ask.Having an unequal society not only affects those in low income groups, but affects those on all levels. Those in well-off groups experience the income and ability to spend more on consumer goods, allowing them to vote on what is being produced. As Wilkinson and Pickett said, government intervention is needed. Because they soak up the tycoon to enforce new rules and regulations, the government should be able to regulate how equal a society should be and eliminate dysfunction when able. The third article, written by Amelia K arabegovic and Charles Lammam, enlightens us with a positive future for Canada.Their studies have found that many individuals start out in low income groups and then resurrect to the middle or high income groups. low-spirited income jobs are meant to be short-term and a step towards a better nonrecreational job. Karabegovic and Lammam found that 60% moved into a higher income group in one year, 79% did so after two, and close to 90% after six. (paragraph 7). Karabegovic and Lammam write with an cheerful attitude for Canadas future. Though they observe low income groups as stepping stones to higher income jobs, this is not always the case.If greater inequality is rising, as it regularizes in the previous articles, then those in low income groups may define it harder to find a job, or even one with a higher paying income. Yes, Canadas dream may absolutely be attainable, but that comes after dealing with the laborious problems like poverty and inequality. This cannot be well -mannered without hard work and the cooperation of all individuals. The cash in ones chips article, Tackling Inequality Now written by Sherri Torjman and Ken conflict, was published on the Caledon embed of Social Policy website in January of 2012.Torjman and passage of arms give readers a perspective to how a Canadian society is perceived today. They say the best way to start change is by recreating and reorganizing the different programs and systems that policy makers create. However, instead of moving society in a positive way, the federal government make expensive changes that moved in a negative direction. Especially during the recession and ticklish economic seasons, the programs and policy choices that are meant to help failed to do so. Programs like the Working Income impose avail and Employment Insurance were created to help, but did not provide support to those who needed it.Often, those in low income groups were not serve for the programs provided. With the Working Income Tax Benefit program, the come invested would barely make a difference. Torjman and involvement suggest that it is important for the government to focus on bettering the Canada Child Tax Benefit and the Working Income Tax Benefit and to invest in education and work training. This article gives readers an honest insight to how the government and the public need to pay attention, improve, and change one of the main issues in society today inequality.As previous articles mentioned, these issues are something Canada struggles to fix. I take hold with many of the points Torjman and Battle make. It seems as though the government has the money to create, continue, and improve these social welfare projects and policies, but they are not using it in an efficient manner. Torjman and Battle hypothesize and conclude that if the government invested more money in the programs that did work and benefit former(a)s, Canada would be heading down a positive road.In conclusion, inequality h as grown over the past years causing money to be spent continuously, but not always in the right places. It is easy to talk about changes and think about what can be improved, nevertheless reservation sure the change happens can be difficult. No one can survey without the help of someone offering support. This idea of reaching out to each other and supporting those who need it most is what can be the start of changing inequality. Yes, the government plays a huge part in changing and shaping Canadas society, but so do the Canadians.